|
Women's Health
Articles - PAP Smear and Cervix/Vaginal Problems
| By Date of Release | Topic |
| December 17, 2000 | HGSIL - High Grade Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix on Pap Smear |
| May 28, 2000 | Abnomal Pap Smear with Atypical Squamous Cell Changes - ASCUS |
| April 16, 2000 | Oral Treatment of Bacterial and/or Yeast Vaginal Infections |
| January 9, 1999 | Vaginal Conditions After Delivery |
| December18, 1999 | Recurrence of Warts with Different Treatments |
| November 14, 1999 | HPV Type Associated with Cancer |
| November 7, 1999 | Vulvar Sweat Gland Cysts |
| September 5, 1999 | Bacterial Vaginal Infections in Pregnancy |
| July 18, 1999 | Genital Warts - Selection of a Treatment Strategy |
| June 6, 1999 | Do You Need a Pap After a Hysterectomy? |
| November 1, 1998 | Signs and Symptoms of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis |
| October 11, 1998 | Natural Progression of an Abnormal Pap |
| August 23, 1998 | Irritant Vulvitis Often Misdiagnosed as Yeast |
| August 2, 1998 | Atypical Glandular Cells of Unknown Significance (AGCUS) |
| June 7, 1998 | Papillomavirus Testing of Abnormal Pap Smears |
| April 5, 1998 | Painful Intercourse Due to Vulvar Vestibulitis |
| February 15, 1998 | STDs in Adolescents |
| January 25, 1998 | Yeast Vaginitis - Treat the Symptoms or Diagnose by Culture? |
| December 21, 1997 | PAP Smear Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer |
| October 10, 1997 | PAP Smear Recommendations |
Signs and Symptoms of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis
Frederick R. Jelovsek MD
Many reproductive age women have experienced vulvovaginal
candidiasis or "yeast" infections in their lifetime. However
candida species of yeast can also exist in the vagina
without causing symptoms and can be found in up to 15% of
asymptomatic women. Yeast symptoms of itching and burning
often overlap with other conditions such as
allergic or irritant vulvitis that we
have written about in the past. Then what exactly are the
signs and symptoms of yeast vulvovaginitis and how reliable
are they to use alone, without any cultures or microscopic
exams, to make a diagnosis on which to begin treatment?
A recent article, Eckert LO, et. al: Vulvovaginal
candidiasis: Clinical manifestations, risk factors,
management algorithm. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 92:757-65,
looked at this diagnosis problem in 774 women coming to a
an STD clinic, but not ones who had been specifically
referred for yeast infections as have previous studies on
this subject. They collected a thorough set of symptoms and
physical signs along with a measurement of vaginal pH,
microscopic exam of the discharge (for yeast, trichomonas
and bacterial laden vaginal cells) as well as a microscopic
exam of the cervical mucous to detect inflammatory (white
blood) cells. They also performed vaginal secretion cultures
for candida species, trichomonas, and mycoplasma and
cervical cultures for gonorrhea and chlamydia
In this group of women who had positive cultures for
candida albicans (remember some women have positive
cultures but no symptoms) signs of vulvar swelling, cracked
skin fissures, a reddened vulva or sores from scratching and
a thick, curdy vaginal discharge were infrequent. When the
women had their symptoms and findings categorized by whether
the culture was positive or negative and whether the
microscopic wet-prep was positive or negative, the
frequencies in the different groups were interesting.
Symptoms and Signs by Test Results
| Symptom/ Sign |
Culture negative wet-mount negative (presumably not infected) |
Culture positive wet-mount negative (uncertain
infection) |
Culture positive wet-mount positive (presumably has infection)
|
| Symptoms |
Chief complaint of vulvar itching or burning |
8% | 13% | 38% |
| vulvar swelling |
10% | 22% | 25% |
| white discharge |
63% | 62% | 68% |
| yellow discharge |
23% | 26% | 22% |
| Examination findings | | | |
| vulvar swelling/edema |
2% | 11% | 22% |
| vulvar redness |
21% | 32% | 72% |
| thick curdy discharge (exam) |
1% | 3% | 28% |
From a women's point of view, this means that you can
easily have a yeast infection without having burning
and itching of the vulvovaginal area. Also though, you can't
tell by the color or even presence of a discharge what kind
of infection you have.
From the doctor's point of view (exam), vulvar redness is
present 3/4's of the time, but not always. A thick, curdy
(cottage cheese) vaginal discharge which we think is
classic for candida infection, is only present about 30% of
the time.
These authors also looked at whether other factors were
associated with a higher incidence of positive yeast
cultures. They found that recent antibiotic use, condom
use, a past history of gonorrhea infection (don't ask me
why) and not having had any previous pregnancies was
associated with a higher incidence of positive cultures.
Interestingly, they also found that there was no higher
incidence of positive cultures:
-
by use of oral contraceptives
-
with absent lactobacillus (the normal vaginal bacteria)
-
by symptoms starting in the last half of the menstrual
cycle
(luteal phase when progesterone is present)
Using all of this data, these authors offered a management
strategy for doctors. A microscopic wet mount test should be
performed on all women who have symptoms or who, on exam, have
findings of vulvar redness or swelling or a thick curdy
discharge on speculum exam. If the wet mount test is positive
for yeast, treatment should be started ( this is usually how
doctors do it now). If the wet mount is negative, a culture
should be performed if any physical exam signs are positive
but the woman has no symptoms, or, if there are no positive
exam signs but a woman has multiple symptoms. If the culture
is positive, treatment is begun.
For a woman to attempt self-treatment without a doctor's
exam, if you have a main problem of vulvar itching and/or
burning, there is about a 50% chance that a vaginal culture
would be positive for yeast. You would save a doctor's visit
by self-treating but if the problem does not go away or
recurs within a week of finishing the over-the-counter,
anti-yeast medication, you should see the doctor to be sure
of the diagnosis or a least start looking for other causes
of vulvar irritation.
top of page
Natural Progression of an Abnormal Pap
Frederick R. Jelovsek MD
Approximately 2-5% of Pap smears will have an abnormal result.
The usual abnormal result categories are:
-
ASCUS - Atypical cells of uncertain significance
-
low grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia
(LGSIL) or mild dysplasia
-
high grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia (HGSIL) consistent
with moderate or severe dysplasia
Many women want to know how serious these findings are. The way
we know what the natural progression of these abnormal Paps is
to follow the woman without treating or doing anything to alter
the normal progression (worsening) or regression (improvement) of
these Paps.
A recent study, Melnikow J: Natural history of cervical
squamous intraepithelial lesions: A meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol
1998;92:727-35, looked at all scientific studies in the
literature since 1970 in which women with abnormal Paps were
followed but not treated. They then analyzed how often the
specific Pap smear improved on it's own and how often it
progressed to a worse lesion:
Abnormal Pap Smear
Natural Progression and Regression
| Abnormal Class | Regression to Normal |
Progression to higher grade over 24 Months |
Progression to invasive cancer over 24 Months |
| ASCUS | 68% | 7% | 0.25% |
| LGSIL | 47% | 21% | 0.15% |
| HGSIL | 35% | 23% | 1.44% |
The studies analyzed took the Pap smear on entry as the true
finding when in fact we know the Pap is a screening test and as
such has some false negatives (could explain progression) and
false positives (could explain regression).
How does HPV (human papilloma virus) affect progression of the
Pap? In one study(1), The rate of CIN
progression was higher with HPV (50.5%) than without HPV (35.4%).
Of the CIN cases with HPV 16, 56.5% progressed, while 30.8% of
the CIN cases with HPV 6 and/or 11 and 35.4% of the CIN cases
without HPV progressed. In other words, HPV subtype 16 was
associated with a higher progression rate but not all subtypes of
HPV.
Another older study before HPV sub typing(2),
looked at progression or regression of a Pap smear showing HPV.
| Abnormal Class | Regression to Normal |
Progression to higher grade over 24 Months |
Progression to invasive cancer over 24 Months |
| HPV only | 45% | 16% | 0% |
| HPV and LGSIL | | 50% | 0% |
1. Konno R, Paez C, Sato S, Yajima A, Fukao A
HPV, histologic grade and age. Risk factors for the progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
J Reprod Med 1998 Jul;43(7):561-6
2. Rome RM, Chanen W, Pagano R
The natural history of human papillomavirus (HPV) atypia of the cervix.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1987 Nov;27(4):287-90
top of page
Irritant Vulvitis Often Misdiagnosed as Yeast
Frederick R. Jelovsek MD
Many women equate burning and itching of the vulva with a yeast
vaginitis. Often their doctors and nurses do the same thing.
Consider for a moment, that many episodes of vulvar irritation
may actually be a primary vulvar dermatitis with a
secondary yeast colonization. This is quite a different
concept, isn't it. It means that on some occasions we need to
primarily treat a contact or irritant dermatitis rather than
rushing out to get the anti-yeast cream.
If that's the case, what are the irritants? In a recent article,
Summers, PR: Vulvovaginal candidiasis: Investigating the
dermatologic connection. Obg Management 1998 August Suppl:2-
6, the point was made that many women are sensitive to common
constituents of creams used to actually treat vulvovaginitis:
- propylene glycol
- methylparaben
- butylated hydroxyanisol (BHA)
- cetyl alcohol
- sodium lauryl sulfate
- methyl benzethonium chloride
- fragrance
Lubricants, spermicides, scented sanitary products, douches,
soaps, and even bubble baths have also be implicated in causing
irritant vulvar dermatitis. We have had women on the message
board who have been sensitive to lubricants used in condoms. Dr.
Summers estimates that almost 50% of the patients seen a special
vulvar clinic have a primary irritant dermatitis with or without
a secondary yeast vulvovaginitis. This is consistent with one
study which did skin patch allergen testing on the vulva and
found almost 50% of women allergic to common chemicals in soaps
and creams.
Treatment of a contact vulvitis is to protect the skin with
petrolatum or solid vegetable oil and to elimininate any further
contact with soaps or creams or any other chemicals. Sometimes
steroid creams are needed. Be sure to look at the chemical
constituents in any products you are using on the vulva or in the
vagina.
top of page
Atypical Glandular Cells of Unknown Significance (AGCUS) on Pap
Frederick R. Jelovsek MD
A call from the doctor's office about an abnormal Pap smear ranks
as a bad news day in anyone's book. While the first thought is
possible cancer of the cervix, there a many grades of abnormal
that are not cancerous. Cancer is certainly the worst grade of an
abnormal Pap; atypical squamous cells of undetermined
significance (ASCUS) is the least abnormal grade. In between, is
mild, moderate and severe dysplasia. All of these classifications refer to the
squamous cells that line the outside of the cervix and
vagina. These are the cells that are exposed to sexual
intercourse and whatever bacteria, viruses and irritants that accumulate over the years.
There is one other type of abnormal cervical cells, glandular
cells on the inside of the cervical canal. The extreme
abnormality of these is adenocarcinoma of the cervix rather than the more usual
squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. The mildest
abnormality of these glandular cells is atypical glandular cells
of undetermined significance (AGCUS or AGCUS). This is an
infrequent category of abnormal Pap but it is more
worrisome than squamous cell atypia (ASCUS).
In a recent article, Cox JT: AGUS Pap smears - A follow-up
strategy. OBG Management 1998;July:74-87, a diagnostic
strategy was outlined to evaluate AGUS Pap smears. It's work up is
quite different than the squamous cell atypia because 20-50% of
women with this Pap result have a more severe, hidden lesion that
requires diagnosis lest it progress into, or already represents, an existing cancer.
Doctors currently have a tendency to treat this category without the respect
that it deserves, because the more commonly occurring squamous abnormality, ASCUS, is much
less frequently associated with more advanced lesions. In
addition, glandular lesions can progress to a cancer more rapidly
than a squamous lesion. They are also more difficult to detect by
colposcopy.
The evaluation process for a squamous atypia, ASCUS, is just to repeat
the Pap in 3-6 months. For AGUS, Dr. Cox and the American Society
of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, recommend an immediate
colposcopy and, at that time, an endocervical curetting
(scraping) to diagnose any worse changes up inside the cervical
canal where you can't see with the colposcope. If there are any
abnormal changes on the curetting, a conization of the cervix
should be done. That can be a LEEP (loop electrical excision
procedure) conization in the office or a "cold knife" conization
in the outpatient surgery unit.
Women need to know that there is intense physician disagreement
about the best way to work-up both ASCUS and AGUS, but also, they need to know that
they are two different Pap abnormalities -- one, AGUS being much
more worrisome and needing more aggressive diagnosis, than the
other, ASCUS. Make sure you know which pap abnormality you have.
top of page
Papillomavirus Testing of Abnormal Pap Smears
Frederick R. Jelovsek MD
The human papillomavirus (HPV) has been identified as the most common
culprit associated with abnormal Pap smears. Some strains of HPV
are apparently more virulent than others and HPV subtypes 16, 18,
31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59 and 68 have been
associated with severe grades of cervical dysplasia and invasive
cancer of the cervix. DNA test is used to identify subtypes of
HPV and up to now it has been more expensive and inconvenient to
offer as routine testing. Theoretically, if all women with
abnormal Pap smears could have HPV subtype testing then those
associated with the more virulent strains would be the only ones
requiring treatment.
Right now the rule-of-thumb in the U.S. is to follow women with
ASCUS (atypical squamous changes of undetermined significance)
and mild dysplasia (CIN I) with repeat Pap smears every 3-6
months. That is because most of them go away on their own as the
woman's body mounts an immune response. Moderate or severe
dysplasia changes are usually treated with procedures that
destroy the affected cells along with normal tissue. It would be
nice to know which women with ASCUS or mild dysplasia were going
to get worse with time. Then they could be treated early. Also it
would be nice to know which women with moderate or severe
dysplasia could be followed with just repeat Pap smears rather
than having to have a destructive procedure to the cervix that
may affect future fertility.
With the advent of the thin Pap, there is fluid left over
from the specimen that can be tested for HPV DNA without having
the woman return for an additional visit and procedure to obtain
a specimen -- Pap or biopsy. Thus if a Pap is abnormal, it can be
immediately tested for worrisome HPV strains. A recent study
looked at the practicality of this. Wright Jr. TC, et al.:
Reflex human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic testing in women
with abnormal Papanicolaou smears. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;
178:962-6.
These authors studied 265 women with different grades of Pap
smears and biopsies. They found that in patients who had ASCUS,
the lowest grade of Pap abnormality, HPV DNA testing could
identify 90% of those women who were likely to have a more severe
lesion (high grade dysplasia) on actual biopsy. Unfortunately,
with the higher grades of Pap abnormality, the testing was not
sensitive or specific enough to be useful as to which women could
be followed rather than biopsied.
While more studies have to be done in this area, our knowledge
about abnormal Paps and HPV has advanced significantly in the last
decade and if the thin Pap test becomes more widely used, we will
see more studies about HPV association that will help us know
in which instances to treat or not treat with greater precision.
top of page
Yeast Vaginitis - Treat the Symptoms or Diagnose by Culture?
By Frederick R. Jelovsek, M.D.,
With symptoms of vaginal burning and a white, curdy discharge,
many women have learned to self-treat with non-prescription,
over-the-counter anti fungal medications. They are wrong only 25%
of the time.(1) In many instances though, this treatment may
permanently cure the problem. But what happens when the symptoms
quickly recur or when this is the fourth time in a year to get an
infection?
The answer for an accurate diagnosis to make sure the
infection is due to yeast organisms (Candida albicans). For the first step,
doctors usually look under the microscope at a wet prep of
the discharge to identify yeast organisms. It is important for
the doctor to make sure there is not a trichomonal or bacterial
infection. Sometimes however, a woman can have a yeast infection
but the number of organisms is too low to show up under the
microscopic exam. On other occasions, the microscopic wet
prep may show yeast organisms but they may be resistant to
the common medications. They may also be yeast organisms other
than the common Candida albicans yeast, such as non-albicans
Candida species, Torulopsis glabrata or Saccharomyces cerevisiae
which don't respond as well to the usual anti fungal medications.
At this point it is best to obtain a specimen of the vaginal
discharge and send it for yeast culture. If it returns as Candida
albicans or one of the other yeasts, this may represent a problem
of resistant organisms and different therapies should be tried.
If no yeast is cultured, that also is important in that it tells
us to look for other uncommon causes of vaginitis such as
physiologic discharge, allergic vaginitis, desquamative
vaginitis, atrophic vaginitis or sometimes a vulvar irritation
that is primary rather than being caused by a vaginal discharge.
In summary, any recurrent vaginitis (four or more in a year)
should be cultured if it is thought to be a yeast vaginitis or if
it is not clear from the microscopic wet prep what the
organism is.
-
Ferris DG, Dedle C, Litaker MS. Women's use of over-the-
counter anti fungal pharmaceutical products for gynecologic
symptoms. J Fam Pract 1996;42:595-600.
top of page
PAP Smear Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer
By Frederick R. Jelovsek, M.D.,
Pap smears are used to diagnose cervical cancer. The
cervix is the lower part of the uterus, the mouth of the womb.
The Pap test is not very accurate for diagnosing endometrial cancer
which is from up in the menstrual lining of the uterus.
Only 50% of the time that endometrial cancer is present are the
Pap smears positive for (glandular) cancer cells. This is not a
high enough percentage to be used as the primary diagnostic test;
endometrial biopsy is usually the diagnostic
procedure of choice although D&C and hysteroscopy are also used.
Sometimes a Pap smear is suggestive of endometrial
cancer rather than cervical cancer and we need to know what it means.
G.L. Eddy and others recently looked at how Pap smears were read
within 1 year of the diagnosis of endometrial cancer,
Eddy GL, Wojtowycz MA, Piraino PS, Mazur MT.
Papanicolaou smears by the Bethesda system in endometrial malignancy:
utility and prognostic importance.
Obstet Gynecol 1997 Dec;90(6):999-1003. They found that almost half
the patients had a abnormal Pap. More importantly, if the Pap smear was
suspicious for endometrial cancer, the cancer was a more severe type. In other words
the cancer had invaded further or was of a more "malignant" type than in women
who did not have a positive Pap.
This study means that if a woman has a Pap smear suspicious for endometrial cancer
and she turns out to actually have cancer, there is a much higher chance that
she will need more than a hysterectomy as treatment. Only less aggressive
endometrial cancers that have not spread deeply into the muscle of the uterus
can be treated with hysterectomy alone. More invasive or aggressive cancers
need additional therapy such as radiation or chemotherapy. They also require
more extensive surgery such as lymph node removal near the major blood vessels and
biopsies. This often requires surgery by specially trained gynecologic
oncologists (cancer surgeons).
top of page
PAP Smear Recommendations
By Frederick R. Jelovsek, M.D.,
Quillen College of Medicine -- Department of Obstetrics and
Gynecology East Tennessee State University
How often is a PAP smear necessary? Different doctors and
organizations have different answers. A 1996 conference as
recently reported in: Braly, P.S., The NIH consensus
conference on cervical cancer: Implications for practice.
Primary Care Update for Ob/Gyns 1997 (4):179-183, gave some
consensus guidelines.
PAP smears should be started when sexual activity starts or at
age 18, whichever is earlier. Three annual PAP smears should
performed and after that, smears can be less than annually if a
patient is low risk. Few women qualify as low risk, meaning no
more than two lifetime sexual partners and a partner with no more
than two lifetime partners. Thus many women should continue to
have a yearly PAP smear and after age 65, all women should have
an annual exam.
Other risk factors for cervical cancer include smoking, lower
socioeconomic status, age, having had multiple pregnancies,
immunosuppression, and sexually transmitted diseases - especially
human papilloma virus (HPV) which is found in 100% of cervical
cancers. Certain strains of HPV, types HPV-16, -18, -31, and -45,
are high risk and account for 80% of cervical cancer. In spite of
this knowledge, there is still no consensus about screening
patients who have abnormal PAP smears for these HPV virus types.
Studies are ongoing to see if this additional screening in
addition to the PAP smear is cost-justified. Most investigators
believe that it not only takes years for the progression from
HPV infection to malignancy but that it is apparent that the
infection alone is not sufficient for the development of cervical
cancer. Other cofactors are needed in addition to HPV. Tobacco
carcinogenic and mutagenic substances, compromised immune status,
dietary deficiencies, radiation exposure and coexisting viral
and bacterial infections are thought to somehow enhance a
malignant transformation.
It is estimated that as many as 5-20% of persons 15-49 years
old are infected with HPV. Vaccines against HPV are currently
being developed but they are not going to be available in the
near future. If you have ever had abnormal PAP smears or had
venereal warts (HPV infection, condyloma accuminata), you should
be sure to get an annual PAP smear for the rest of your life.
top of page
|